Port Arthur Massacre
This tragic occassion occured on 28th April 1996
Arthur inquiry urged
Sunday Telegraph (NSW) March 4, 2001
"A PORT Arthur survivor yesterday called for an
inquiry into Australia’s worst massacre, saying she believed
there had been “a hell of a cover-up.”
Wendy Scurr, a tour guide at the historic site in April
1996 when 35 people were killed, said there were many unanswered
issues surrounding the massacre. However, she declined to
elaborate, saying she was saving her information for a meeting
in Inverell, NSW, this month.
The killings have given rise to Right-wing conspiracy theories
that they were orchestrated as a plot to disarm Australia."
QUESTIONS ? QUESTIONS ?
you know that there is no forensic evidence to show that Martin
Bryant was at Port Arthur on the massacre? (Although he
later arrived at Seascape)
is not one fingerprint, or smear of saliva, or hair, or DNA,
or footprint of Martin Byant.
you dare to ask for evidence that the gunman was Martin Bryant,
then be careful - one man has already been threatened with
arrest for asking a forensic question at a Forensics Conference!
for the witnesses? When given 30 photographs from which to
pick the gunman, some of the witnesses already had an image
of Bryant in their minds because THE MERCURY kindly printed
a large photo on the front page. One witness actually said
she recognised him by his jumper - which she saw on the Mercury
photo - we know the gunman had not worn a jumper!!
wasn't THE MERCURY prosecuted for obstructing the course of
MORON IS GENIUS BEHIND MASSACRE - SIMPLETON
DOES THE IMPOSSIBLE:
"...The first element was secured with
the Port Arthur massacre that saw a right handed gunman ‘head-shoot’
twenty people in thirty seconds. A left handed retard, with no shooting
experience, was convicted and a thirty year ban immediately placed on
will never be uniform gun laws in Australia until we see a massacre
in Tasmania." Barry Unsworth, New South Wales Premier, December
Police are always trained to cordon off a crime
scene for forensics and investigators, so they can look at every piece
of evidence, 'undisturbed'; however, the Prime Minister Mr John
Howard, quickly ordered that some buildings (evidence) at the
Port Arthur massacre be destroyed, shortly after the massacre took place.
(Waco, Texas, was likewise flattened to the ground, destroying much
evidence. This was immediately after the FBI, ATF and US Army killed
many innocent civilians, in what many claim was nothing but a well planned
military / social experiment.)
SUGGESTS MARTIN IS THE FALL GUY?
Video footage presented the night before the trial, showed someone who
looked 'similar' to Martin Bryant at the day of the shootings. It turns
out that this video footage is a forgery, and was thus fake evidence.
The man running across the car park is in fact not Martin Bryant at
all, but is an employee, running to aid the wounded, hence the men relaxing
on the verandah outside the building that Martin Bryant supposedly had
just left, after killing people. One spectator on the verandah was having
piece of footage shows someone who looks like Martin Bryant, superimposed
upon the film, revealed by the halo effect around the insert. Also,
the insert is black and white, whilst the rest of the photo is in colour!
was no, nor ever has been any forensic evidence found such as DNA or
fingerprints belonging to Martin Bryant, that links Martin Bryant to
the shootings in the café.
though Martin Bryant was witnessed as having stopped for coffee at the
Shell Service Station at Forcett, 30km north of Seascape, whilst someone
was shooting at Seascape at the same time, Martin Bryant has been accused.
though Martin Bryant was later witnessed buying petrol 15km north of
Seascape at the Convict Bakery Service Station at TARANNA, between 11.45am
and 11.50am, while people were being massacred by 2 or 3 shooters at
Port Arthur, Martin Bryant was charged by John Howard as guilty.
was next witnessed visiting Roger Larner between about 1.05pm and 1.15pm.
He was then witnessed entering the tollbooth by staff about 1.15pm,
at the same time that a gunman was witnessed at the Port Arthur Historic
Site messing about in the car park. Regardless, the Australian Prime
Minister John Howard charged Martin Bryant as guilty.
Martin was guilty or not, one fact remains clear, he was denied a fair
trial, and instead was put through a 'kangeroo court', with all surviving
evidence locked away for 30 years!
Survivors say that there are suspicious circumstances
surrounding the Port Arthur Massacre, such as the person who shot him
(one survivor) had a skin problem, not at all like the smooth "angel
like" face of Martin Bryant!
number of survivors were so disturbed, that they immediately purchased
hand guns for personnel protection, saying that "....if someone
had a gun at Port Arthur, they could have shot the killer/'s, and saved
many people's lives!"
JOHN HOWARD A PROPHET?
Only weeks earlier, Mr John Howard warned Australians via the media
that unless Australia has tougher gun laws, there would soon be a massacre
in Australia. Coincidence?
the massacre, John Howard illegally (no referendum) brought in
laws to disarm the nation. He, Mr John Howard, gave a speech almost
identical to the following:-
year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilised nation
has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more
efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!"
Adolph Hitler, 1935.
reaching a historic agreement on prohibition of weapons, we made a mighty
contribution to delivering a safer and more secure Australian society.
John Howard, 1997,
Australian Prime Minister.
Since 1996-7, many honest civilians have become, in effect, defenceless;
whilst criminals, police and elitists such as John Laws still carry
weapons for personal protection, denied to us lesser mortals. ("All
people (animals) are created equal, but some people (animals) are more
equal than others..." from the book Animal farm.)
Has gun related crime diminished since 1996? NO! In fact, armed robbery
has increased dramatically, and Australia is now in an unenviable position,
i.e: the richest nation in the world for resources, yet the most defenceless
and helpless against any foreseeable invasion (NOTE: invasion from
within or without).
by Robert Bruce.
to Top of